Don’t be ‘mute witness’ to hate speech, SC tells govt | India News

NEW DELHI: Observe that hate speech The Supreme Court on Wednesday said severe action must be taken against the guilty, like a poison that is damaging India’s social fabric and the political parties that are making capital. it at the cost of social harmony. The Center asked if the Center was contemplating developing a law to address the threat as recommended by the Legislative Committee because the current system is not sufficient to prevent such incidents effectively. meaningful.
A bench of Judges KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy said the Center should not be a “dumb witness” and would instead take the lead in handling the matter. Nor should the government treat this as a “trivial matter”, the bench said, hinting that it would fill the legal void by passing orders and instructions framed by what the courts say. climax did earlier in the Vishaka case for sexual handling. exploitation in the workplace.
The bench was particularly hit by their TV channels and anchors for allowing others to spread hate in their shows, and said those with such behavior should be dealt with. strict and forgiving to send a stern message to others don’t use hate for TRP.
It says that people must understand that no religion preaches hatred, all people belong to the country and there is no place of hatred.
Under current law, neither hate speech is defined, nor is there a specific provision to restrict it. Police use Sections 153(A) and 295, which deal with the incitement and spread of discontent among communities, to address this. Although calls to support a specific anti-hate speech provision in the law have been steadily growing, defining what constitutes “hate speech” can be difficult, with authorities at risk. use an expansive law to restrict freedom of speech.
At the start of the hearing, the court asked the petitioners who were the ultimate beneficiaries of the hate speech. They admitted it was a politician. “It was an honest answer,” the court said.
“The political parties are making money from it. The role of the anchor (in the news channels) is very important. Hate speech takes place on mainstream television or on social media. The media. society is largely unregulated… As far as mainstream TV channels are concerned… it’s the manager’s duty to stop hate speech by not allowing one person to say anything more. what,” said SC.
People should always remember that those targeted and persecuted are also citizens of this country, and organizations like the press should promote the constitutional principles of fraternity that wouldn’t exist if everyone fought. compete with each other, the court said. “Political parties will come and go but the nation will endure the institution that includes the press… Without a completely independent press, no country can move forward. It is absolutely important but the government should put in place a mechanism that everyone must follow. Why would you consider it a trivial matter,” the SC asked the Center after assuming it was collating information from the states.
Supporter Sanjay Tyagi, who appeared for the Center, said it had received information from 14 states, and that the Center would send a response once it received information from other states.
The Judiciary Committee recommended the insertion of Section 153 C into the Indian Penal Code, which would define anyone because of religion, race, caste or community, sex, gender identity, orientation sex, place of birth, place of residence, language, disability, or tribal use Serious threats – whether spoken or written – or hate speech are punishable by imprisonment for up to two years and a fine of up to two years. up to Rs 5,000. SC has heard a series of petitions for court intervention to stop hate speech and incitement because such incidents are increasing and are a threat to peace and harmony. of the country.
BJP leader and supporter Ashwini Upadhyay countered that the Law Commission had in a comprehensive report in 2017 recommended the introduction of a separate provision in the IPC to deal with hate speech, but it has not been done so far.
Given that states and UT are obligated to take preventive, remedial, and punitive measures to prevent hate speech under the 2018 ruling, the court in the final hearing ordered Ask them to submit a report on the actions they have taken in the past four years. The Supreme Court, in a 2018 ruling, said that separatist and mob violence threatens society, incited by intolerance and misinformation through the circulation of fake news and misinformation. untrue story.
Regarding containment measures, the summit court directed that an SP-class officer be appointed as base officer in each county to take measures to prevent incidents of mob violence.

Source link


News 7D: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button