No criminality in 5.8k intercepted calls in Radia tapes: CBI to SC

NEW DELHI: Almost 12 years after the scandal’Tape Radia‘praised the reputations of many, including politicians, industrialists, lawyers and journalists, the Fourth Center told the Supreme Court that the CBI investigation into the intercepted chats Do not disclose the crime.
CBI registered 14 preliminary questions on the matter, additional attorney general Aishwarya Bhati informed a bench of Judges DY Chandrachud, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha.
This is tantamount to providing a comfort to corporate lobbyists Niira Radiawho appears to have connections across social, political, bureaucratic and journalistic circles and her intercepted phone conversations range from the resolution of personal problems to the appointment of Cabinet ministers to dictate what journalists should write.
Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati on Wednesday informed the SC bench that the matter regarding the Radia tapes had become virtually irrelevant because of the concern of petitioner Ratan N Tata, the chairman. In honor of the Tata group, seeking to protect its privacy and restricting the media from publishing excerpts of blocked conversations with corporate lobbyist Niira Radia has been of considerable interest by amending the Indian Telegraph Act to strengthen the blocking procedure and by the 2017 ruling of the nine-judge panel of SC in the Puttaswamy case enhancing privacy as part of the right to life.
But the NGO Center for PIL, which has sought to make the conversations public, through campaigner Prashant Bhushan said he would study the matter to answer the court’s question – “need What more should be done in this regard?” The bench told Bhushan that if he had his own reasons for action arising from any issue, he could file a separate petition. The Supreme Court adjourned the case to October 17.
Until 2012, leaked snippets of Radia’s blocked calls with others and the follow-up poll ordered by SC caused a daily buzz. At the behest of an SC tape headed by Judiciary Professor Singhvi, the IT department, which intercepted Radia’s phone calls at the direction of the Ministry of Finance, submitted transcripts of all 5,851 call records on January 8, 2013.
On February 21, 2013, SC formed a special team of officers from the CBI and IT department to review the transcripts and “submit a report on whether the conversations yielded criminal signs of the perpetrators.” interlocutor or not”. The group submitted its report on July 30, 2013.
On July 31, 2013, the CBI volunteered before the SC to “question some of the issues covered in the report”. CBI filed a sealed report on its investigations on March 25, 2014.
The final effective hearing was held on April 29, 2014, when the SC framed the following issues for trial in Tata’s 2010 petition – Privacy to Government; Privacy with respect to the media; and Right to Information.
“The issue of criminal or illegality in awarding various contracts, etc. to private parties has emerged in recorded conversations between different people that will be brought up after We complete hearings on these three issues before our eyes.” said.

Source link


News 7D: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Back to top button