Ohio Republicans propose their own “Don’t Say Gay” Bill, with an aspect of Serious Racial Theory.

Florida’s so-called “No Gay” law seems to be inspiring conservatives across the country; Republican Party in Ohio recommend an invoice Second, mirroring Florida’s ban on classroom discussion of gender identity and sexual orientation, and for its own sake, the Ohio bill also includes a host of hysterical racial theories that are important. The bill would prohibit Ohio public school teachers from using “any curriculum or instructional materials about sexual orientation or gender identity” in grades kindergarten through third. It would also prohibit teachers of students in grades 4 through 12 from discussing “sexual orientation or gender identity in any way that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for the student in the state standards.” And included in this anti-LGBTQ+ bill is a ban on all material that discusses “critical racial theory”, “copulation theory” and “genetic racial complexes”, (excerpted from specific guide Nikole Hannah-Jones‘S Project 1619 because the New York Times) and a provision prohibiting the teaching of any “concept that the state board of education defines as divisive or inherently racist.”

“They put teachers in a position where they cannot constantly regulate their words and actions,” Christina Collins, Ohio State Board of Education member, told Vanity Fair, added that the bill is a “complete ban on diversity” in Ohio public schools. “Students often turn to their teachers and school counselors for support, especially when it comes to exploring issues with self-identity,” she said. “In my opinion, this is the worst possible outcome for LGBTQ+ children: having no one to turn to when they need a trusted adult.”

Co-response of the bill, Ohio State representative Mike Loychik, claim that it encourages the use of “unbiased and age-appropriate” curriculum, and Jean Schmidt adds that it gives parents “a voice in what is taught to their children” — a justification that Republicans have also used to defend Florida’s laws. The proposal comes as Republicans nationwide have accelerated the anti-LGBTQ+ agenda at the state level, pushing for laws that often target children. Other states have banned transgender children from participating in sports teams that match their gender identity. Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo, a Democrat, denounced the Ohio Republican’s bill as a “disgusting” attempt to “[legitimize] obstinate ‘in a Tuesday’ declare. “This to me speaks to the extremism that continues to run rampant in this state, and that we cannot continue to grow as a state economically, is what is right for Ohio’s families. us, if we don’t embrace our diversity and make sure this state Russo says. (Loychik and Schmidt’s office did not immediately respond when contacted for comment.)

Critics are particularly wary of the bill’s vague language. The bill does not detail which materials qualify as “age” and “fit for development.” Collins says that “confusing and ambiguous” language puts teachers in an impossible bind. “Who can determine what is age-appropriate?” she asked. The current proposal allows members of the public to freely control what constitutes such a violation, as they can file complaints against school employees who they believe have broken the law. School officials will then face a hearing on the charges. Penalties will include suspension of permits, or cutting off school funding.

Scott DiMauro, president of the Ohio Education Association (OEA), a lobbying group for Ohio educators, warned that the bill would “put both teachers and parents in a really difficult position.” DiMauro questioned whether it would allow a teacher to mention the family of a student with gay parents and asked if a teacher could be fired if the student participated in a project. family tree project in the classroom or not. “Essentially, these bills are cynical attempts to use race and now sexual orientation and gender identity as related issues to sow division and sow conflict and ultimately to score cheap political points,” DiMauro told The Columbus Dispatch. “Lawmakers who are pushing these kinds of agendas should be ashamed of themselves.”

Better stories from Vanity Fair

– Host of Fox News Entertainment Putin-friendly talking points. Then their colleague was killed in Ukraine
– The life and confession of Mob Chef David Ruggerio
– Kremlin always blurs Red lines around nuclear war
– Calls for Complaint, Resignation, and Even Impeachment: Democrats Report Ethical Campaign Around Clarence Thomas
– Two Ukrainian AP journalists took the picture The most devastating moments of war
– Trump: If I were President, I would threaten Drop nuclear bombs on Russia
What will Dems do? What if Biden does not run?
Bodies, Beheading, Jewish Space Lasers: All Kevin McCarthy Had To “Tell” Republican Lawmakers About
– The truth behind the Republicans’ Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Lowly Question
– From the Repository: Molly Bloom’s House of Cards
– Not a subscriber? Participation Vanity Fair to get full access to VF.com and the entire online archive now.

Source link


News of max: Update the world's latest breaking news online of the day, breaking news, politics, society today, international mainstream news .Updated news 24/7: Entertainment, Sports...at the World everyday world. Hot news, images, video clips that are updated quickly and reliably

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button