Former Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin’s defamation case against New York Times will go to trial on Monday, when jury selection begins on a case that could affect press freedom. In 2017, Palin sued the newspaper for a Editor that, in a hasty attempt to make sense of a gunman opening fire on a congressional baseball practice, incorrect creating a causal link between a map circulated by Palin’s political action committee and another mass shooting involving elected officials: The 2011 Arizona shooting, which left six people killed and the congresswoman was injured Gabby Giffords. Yes no proof to back up a link between Palin’s election ad and the shooting, and Times Quickly clarify and correct errors, with the page editor afterwards James Bennet admit it is the result of “[moving] too fast,” each NPR. Weeks later Palin still filed a lawsuit, alleging that the newspaper and Bennet – who added the controversial passage to the manuscript – had defamed her. While a judge initially dismissed the case, a federal appeals court bring it back to life in 2019, setting the stage for Monday’s trial.
“The problem is that the elasticity of protections allows news organizations to issue tough coverage of public figures,” Washington Post‘S Erik Wemple write in this case, note that it’s a thing that “will help draw the line between really bad journalism and smear journalism.”
Palin’s success in court will depend on her ability to convince the jury that Bennet and the newspaper acted with “genuine malice,” meaning the news organization knew what it was posting. untruth or act recklessly with the truth. Legal standards have protected media in smears brought by public figures since 1964 New York Times sues Sullivan and legal experts say the 2008 Republican vice-presidential nominee will face difficulty during the trial. Bennet’s “emergency mode or instant panic mode” when he learned what happened showed he wasn’t aware of any mistakes, said Fordham University law professor Benjamin Zipursky told Reuters, noting that “negligence or carelessness – even gross negligence – is clearly not good enough for Palin to win.”
But Palin’s resurrected case raises concerns about First Amendment protections for the press, even if she ultimately loses. Disputing “over an editorial, essentially an opinion” makes it “a potentially dangerous area” for “[giving] public officials give the green light to litigate on editorials with which they disagree,” speak Professor of Law and Communication at Syracuse University Roy Gutterman. First Amendment attorney Ted Bourous lift up similar to CNN, categorizing Palin’s efforts as “part of a disturbing trend in recent years where high-profile political figures have misused smear lawsuits as political stunts to bring down low-key speech on issues of public concern – exactly what the First Amendment forbids.”
As the Republican nominee for vice president in 2008, Palin made attacks on the “lamestream media” that became a mainstay of her campaign, NPR’s David Folkenflik Noteand have for several years accused ‘s news store unfair treatment. ONE Times spokesperson told CNN’s Oliver Darcy that it hopes to “reaffirm a fundamental principle of U.S. law: public figures should not use libel suits to punish news organizations for inadvertent errors.” Regardless, it will be “a great experience” for Gray Lady, CNN’s chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin guess, “Because of the simple fact that the story was wrong. And no journalist wants to be in a position to defend a false story.”
The battle of what Times Deputy General Counsel David McGraw Yes summon “An honest mistake” could lead to the Supreme Court. Palin “has signaled in court papers that she will challenge the Sullivan case precedent on appeal if she loses at trial,” according to Reuters. At least two conservative judges—Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch-Yes shown their willingness to reconsider the landmark ruling, potentially opening the door for loathed government officials to file lawsuits against the media more easily.
Better stories from Vanity Fair
– The Rosanne Boyland’s Life and DeathCapitol Rioter
– Ghislaine Maxwell’s The guilty verdict raises the question
– Kimberly Guilfoyle’s Leaked Text No support for Trumps
– Why did the Bidding Team Reject the Proposal for “Free Quick Quiz for Holidays”?
– Melania Trump’s 2022 Resolution: Grift like there’s no tomorrow
– Elizabeth Holmes’s Guilty Judgment Won’t Change Silicon Valley
– TV star Sarah Wynter’s Battle with postpartum psychosis
– From the Archive: Inside Theranos’ Strange Last Days
– Not a subscriber? Participation Vanity Fair to get full access to VF.com and the entire online archive now.